I found this week’s blog assignment fun and interesting. My
husband often comments that I am a people watcher. When I have commented that a
person’s actions do not match what they are saying he has asked “How would you
know that?” In the past I have replied “I don’t know, I just do.” This week I quoted
the text on page 123, where it stated that “women exhibit greater sensitivity to
nonverbal messages” and “they also decode others’ nonverbal behavior more
accurately, particularly those involving the face” (O’Hair & Wiemann, 2009).
He found it amusing!
For this week’s assignment I chose to watch a new sitcom on
ABC called Bunheads by executive
producer Amy Sherman-Palladino. I watched
the pilot episode using the onDemand feature of my cable network, the first
time with the sound off and the second with the sound on.
The show began focusing on two chorus girls on a Vegas
stage. They are talking during the performance, so my interpretation was that
they are friends. It moves to a scene back stage where a man arrives and the
lead female character is obviously uncomfortable, she does not seem to know him
well. He arrived bearing gifts and does not seem persuaded by her lack of
interest.
They later appear dining together, she is drinking heavily
and he seems to be trying to persuade her about something. Then they are in a car with what appeared
to be an engagement ring on her finger.
There is an additional storyline in the show. I next saw an
older woman teaching ballet class. There is a definite focus on four of the
teenage girls in the class. The eye-rolling and dismissive looks by one
character lead me to believe there is a pecking order in this group of friends.
Another girls constant self-grooming leads me to believe she is self-conscious
and probably the one at the bottom of the order.
These storylines intersect when the original couple arrive
at their destination and meet the older woman. There is a lot of hand gesturing
and what appears to be yelling. Through eye contact I interpret it is the man
that knows the older woman and she is not happy about something that has taken
place.
When I watched again with the sound on I found that my
assumptions were pretty accurate.
The dancer, Michelle, is being pursued by a man named Hubbell
who is not from Vegas but loves her from afar. On their dinner date, as she
talks about how she is unhappy with her life right now, he convinces her to get
married. I thought they were only engaged. The older woman is Hubbell’s mother
who is not at all happy that her son got married to someone she did not know. I
was also accurate in my observation of the dance students, but verbal communication
between various characters reveals that the girl at the top of the pecking
order has many insecurities of her own.
My assumptions would have been more accurate if I was
watching a show I know well because I would have had more background
information on the characters and their relationships to each other. I would
have had more experience interpreting how the characters communicate through verbal
and nonverbal means.
Reference
O’Hair, D., & Wiemann, M.
(2009). Real communication: An introduction. New York: Bedford/St.
Martin’s.
Michele,
ReplyDeleteI loved your post. When we watch showed that we are use too, we pay close attention to small details, almost as if we miss something, its like the end of the world. And so being challenged to not only choose a show that we have not seen and then look at it in silence is a unique observation. Its almost like someone watching us from a far and they are judging the conversation by the body language and movements/facial gestures. This exercise has prompted me to take a closer look at my perceived body language that I display on a dail bases. I realize that the message that I might being sending, could or could not be far from what I seek to convey. Nice post.